• ELRS Post: Week of 4/10/17

    This week’s post, Funding Adaptation: Financing Resiliency Through Sea Level Derivatives, discusses risks created by sea level rise and was written by Sevren Gourley, Editor-in-Chief of the Virginia Environmental Law Journal. Read the post here.

  • Funding Adaptation: Financing Resiliency Through Sea Level Derivatives

    By Sevren Gourley Sevren Gourley is a 3L at the University of Virginia School of Law and Editor-in-Chief of the Virginia Environmental Law Journal. This post is part of the Environmental Law Review Syndicate. Read the original here and leave a comment. Coastal municipalities are struggling to address the uncertain future risks created by sea level rise. Conventional models of ex ante protection and ex post relief are both too costly and often insufficient to mitigate the impacts of climate change. Sea level derivative instruments provide an alternative model for financing adaptation projects that allow municipalities to transfer the risk of…

  • ELRS Post: Week of 3/27/2017

    This week’s post, Endangered Species Act to the Rescue? Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation under the ESA, was written by Olivia Bensinger, Managing Editor of the Harvard Environmental Law Review. Read the post here.

  • Endangered Species Act to the Rescue? Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Under the ESA

    By Olivia Bensinger Olivia Bensinger is a 3L at Harvard Law School and managing editor of the Harvard Environmental Law Review.   This post is part of the Environmental Law Review Syndicate (ELRS).  Read the original at Ecology Law Quarterly’s website. As we move further into the era of climate change, we often find ourselves looking in unlikely places for tools with which to combat global warming. The Endangered Species Act[1] (“ESA”) was enacted in 1973 for the singular purpose of protecting endangered and threatened species of animals and plants. The ESA has attacked this problem with all its might, and has been a…

  • ELRS Post: Week of 3/6/2017

    This week’s post, Enough Horsing Around, covers the treatment of carriage horses in New York City’s Central Park and was written by Joseph Godio, a Senior Editor of the Georgetown Environmental Law Review. Read the post here.

  • Enough Horsing Around

    By Joseph Godio Joseph Godio is a 3L at Georgetown University Law Center and a senior editor of the Georgetown Environmental Law Review.   This post is part of the Environmental Law Review Syndicate (ELRS).  Read the original at Ecology Law Quarterly’s website. Introduction New York City is a city thought by many to be one of the most incredible, majestic, and beautiful cities in the world. Its prominence and prosperity has grown just like the skyline, continuously reaching new heights. Ironically, one of the most beautiful places in New York City, Central Park, is also home to one of the…

  • ELRS Post: Week of 2/27/2017

    Climate Change Regulation Through Litigation: New York’s Investigation of ExxonMobil under the Martin Act Chris Erickson Chris is a Junior Editor of the Michigan Journal of Environmental and Administrative Law at the University of Michigan Law School. He can be reached at cerick@umich.edu.

  • Climate Change Regulation Through Litigation: New York’s Investigation of ExxonMobil under the Martin Act

    Chris Erickson   This post is part of the Environmental Law Review Syndicate. Read the original here and leave a comment. In November 2015, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman began an investigation into whether ExxonMobil made public statements about climate change that conflicted with its own internal research.[i] Schneiderman issued a subpoena to ExxonMobil ordering production of documents related to its internal climate change research and the use of that research in making strategic decisions.[ii] This investigation differentiates itself from previous climate change litigation by attempting to hold companies responsible for their contributions to climate change using laws unrelated…

  • ELRS Post: Week of December 19, 2016

    This week’s post is The Legislative History of the National Park Service’s Conservation and Nonimpairment Mandate.  It was written by Caitlin Brown, a 3L at Berkeley Law and Co-Editor in Chief of Ecology Law Quarterly.  Read the post here.

  • The Legislative History of the National Park Service’s Conservation and Nonimpairment Mandate

    By Caitlin Brown Caitlin Brown is a 3L at Berkeley Law and Co-Editor in Chief of Ecology Law Quarterly.   This post is part of the Environmental Law Review Syndicate (ELRS).  Read the original at Ecology Law Quarterly’s website.  Introduction The National Park Service manages over 84 million acres of land divided between 413 different sites, and in 2015 alone, served 307.2 million visitors.[1] Their management goals are based on the 1916 National Park Service Organic Act (“the Act”). Section 1 of the Act defines the Park Service’s purpose as “to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects…